ghsa-vc9q-498x-49qm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-30 09:31
Modified
2024-07-30 09:31
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check index msg_id before read or write
[WHAT] msg_id is used as an array index and it cannot be a negative value, and therefore cannot be equal to MOD_HDCP_MESSAGE_ID_INVALID (-1).
[HOW] Check whether msg_id is valid before reading and setting.
This fixes 4 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-42121", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-07-30T08:15:04Z", severity: null, }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Check index msg_id before read or write\n\n[WHAT]\nmsg_id is used as an array index and it cannot be a negative value, and\ntherefore cannot be equal to MOD_HDCP_MESSAGE_ID_INVALID (-1).\n\n[HOW]\nCheck whether msg_id is valid before reading and setting.\n\nThis fixes 4 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity.", id: "GHSA-vc9q-498x-49qm", modified: "2024-07-30T09:31:52Z", published: "2024-07-30T09:31:52Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42121", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59d99deb330af206a4541db0c4da8f73880fba03", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9933eca6ada0cd612e19522e7a319bcef464c0eb", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a31ea49dc8064a557565725cf045944307476a6e", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae91ffbc8b8d942e3e7f188728cad557b7ed5ee4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5b8837d066cc182ff69fb5629ad32ade5484567", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fbb0701af9734cff13917a4b98b5ee9da2fde48d", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.