ghsa-v8xr-r568-8jxh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:17
Modified
2022-04-30 18:17
Details
Buffer overflow in fbglyph.c in XFree86 before 4.2.0, related to glyph clipping for large origins, allows attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly gain privileges via a large number of characters, possibly through the web page search form of KDE Konqueror or from an xterm command with a long title.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2001-0955" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2001-09-22T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in fbglyph.c in XFree86 before 4.2.0, related to glyph clipping for large origins, allows attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly gain privileges via a large number of characters, possibly through the web page search form of KDE Konqueror or from an xterm command with a long title.", "id": "GHSA-v8xr-r568-8jxh", "modified": "2022-04-30T18:17:04Z", "published": "2022-04-30T18:17:04Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-0955" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7673" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7683" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/fb/fbglyph.c" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=100776624224549\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=100784290015880\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=vuln-dev\u0026m=100118958310463\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3657" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3663" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/RELNOTES2.html#2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.xfree86.org/security" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.