ghsa-rxmx-rf7q-7wh5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:25
Modified
2022-05-03 03:25
Details

slapd (aka ns-slapd) in 389 Directory Server 1.2.7.5 (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x or dirsrv) does not properly handle simple paged result searches, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via multiple search requests.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-0019"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-02-23T19:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "slapd (aka ns-slapd) in 389 Directory Server 1.2.7.5 (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x or dirsrv) does not properly handle simple paged result searches, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via multiple search requests.",
  "id": "GHSA-rxmx-rf7q-7wh5",
  "modified": "2022-05-03T03:25:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-03T03:25:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0019"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666076"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670914"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0293.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46489"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025102"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.