GHSA-RVW9-8M2P-4PGM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-13 00:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 08:36
VLAI
Details

An Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS )to the device upon receiving and processing a specific malformed ISO VPN BGP UPDATE packet.

Continued receipt of this packet will cause a sustained Denial of Service condition.

This issue affects:

  • Juniper Networks Junos OS:
  • All versions prior to 20.4R3-S6;
  • 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S5;
  • 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S4;
  • 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S3;
  • 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S3;
  • 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R2-S2, 22.1R3;
  • 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2-S1, 22.2R3;
  • 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R1-S2, 22.3R2.

Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved:

  • All versions prior to 20.4R3-S6-EVO;
  • 21.1-EVO version 21.1R1-EVO and later versions prior to 21.2R3-S4-EVO;
  • 21.3-EVO versions prior to 21.3R3-S3-EVO;
  • 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R3-S3-EVO;
  • 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R3-EVO;
  • 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R2-S1-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO;
  • 22.3-EVO versions prior to 22.3R1-S2-EVO, 22.3R2-EVO.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-44185"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-13T00:15:12Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "\nAn Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS )to the device upon receiving and processing a specific malformed ISO VPN BGP UPDATE packet.\n\nContinued receipt of this packet will cause a sustained Denial of Service condition.\n\nThis issue affects:\n\n\n\n  *  Juniper Networks Junos OS:\n  *  All versions prior to 20.4R3-S6;\n  *  21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S5;\n  *  21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S4;\n  *  21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S3;\n  *  21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S3;\n  *  22.1 versions prior to 22.1R2-S2, 22.1R3;\n  *  22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2-S1, 22.2R3;\n  *  22.3 versions prior to 22.3R1-S2, 22.3R2.\n\n\n\n\nJuniper Networks Junos OS Evolved:\n\n\n\n  *  All versions prior to 20.4R3-S6-EVO;\n  *  21.1-EVO version 21.1R1-EVO and later versions prior to 21.2R3-S4-EVO;\n  *  21.3-EVO versions prior to 21.3R3-S3-EVO;\n  *  21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R3-S3-EVO;\n  *  22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R3-EVO;\n  *  22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R2-S1-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO;\n  *  22.3-EVO versions prior to 22.3R1-S2-EVO, 22.3R2-EVO.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-rvw9-8m2p-4pgm",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T08:36:50Z",
  "published": "2023-10-13T00:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-44185"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA73146"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…