GHSA-RMJJ-53PR-XRWC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 09:30 – Updated: 2026-09-17 18:31Apache Airflow Akeyless provider: the Akeyless secrets backend's team-scope guard can be bypassed with a user-controlled key. In a multi-team deployment, a Dag author scoped to one team can supply a Variable key containing a path separator that causes the backend to resolve a secret belonging to a different team, because the lookup path is concatenated from an unvalidated key after the team-scoped lookup misses. The Execution API Variables route accepts a path-shaped key, so this is reachable from ordinary Dag code.
Affects multi-team deployments using the Akeyless secrets backend. Single-team deployments are not affected, as there is no cross-team boundary to cross. This is the same class as CVE-2026-68870, CVE-2026-68871 and CVE-2026-68872 in the Azure Key Vault, Yandex Lockbox and Amazon secrets backends.
Users of apache-airflow-providers-akeyless are recommended to upgrade to version 0.3.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-86465"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-639"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T09:17:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Apache Airflow Akeyless provider: the Akeyless secrets backend\u0027s team-scope guard can be bypassed with a user-controlled key. In a multi-team deployment, a Dag author scoped to one team can supply a Variable key containing a path separator that causes the backend to resolve a secret belonging to a different team, because the lookup path is concatenated from an unvalidated key after the team-scoped lookup misses. The Execution API Variables route accepts a path-shaped key, so this is reachable from ordinary Dag code.\n\nAffects multi-team deployments using the Akeyless secrets backend. Single-team deployments are not affected, as there is no cross-team boundary to cross. This is the same class as CVE-2026-68870, CVE-2026-68871 and CVE-2026-68872 in the Azure Key Vault, Yandex Lockbox and Amazon secrets backends.\n\nUsers of apache-airflow-providers-akeyless are recommended to upgrade to version 0.3.1 or later, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-rmjj-53pr-xrwc",
"modified": "2026-09-17T18:31:46Z",
"published": "2026-09-16T09:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-86465"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72646"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/vczt5xgqjv8ot8fpp1vdq3rmnfm50w0g"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/vczt5xgqjv8ot8fpp1vdq3rmnfm50w0g?users@airflow.apache.org"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68870"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68871"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68872"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.