ghsa-rh24-rxj5-hccw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:48
Modified
2022-05-17 01:48
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the ast_parse_digest function in main/utils.c in Asterisk 1.8.x before 1.8.10.1 and 10.x before 10.2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string in an HTTP Digest Authentication header.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-1184" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-09-18T18:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the ast_parse_digest function in main/utils.c in Asterisk 1.8.x before 1.8.10.1 and 10.x before 10.2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string in an HTTP Digest Authentication header.", "id": "GHSA-rh24-rxj5-hccw", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:48:25Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:48:25Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1184" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74083" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2012-003-1.8.diff" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2012-003.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/80126" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48417" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.asterisk.org/node/51797" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/17" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026813" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.