ghsa-rh24-q2xr-hfgm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-21 18:31
Modified
2024-07-05 09:33
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gfs2: Fix slab-use-after-free in gfs2_qd_dealloc
In gfs2_put_super(), whether withdrawn or not, the quota should be cleaned up by gfs2_quota_cleanup().
Otherwise, struct gfs2_sbd will be freed before gfs2_qd_dealloc (rcu callback) has run for all gfs2_quota_data objects, resulting in use-after-free.
Also, gfs2_destroy_threads() and gfs2_quota_cleanup() is already called by gfs2_make_fs_ro(), so in gfs2_put_super(), after calling gfs2_make_fs_ro(), there is no need to call them again.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2023-52760", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-416", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-05-21T16:15:15Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngfs2: Fix slab-use-after-free in gfs2_qd_dealloc\n\nIn gfs2_put_super(), whether withdrawn or not, the quota should\nbe cleaned up by gfs2_quota_cleanup().\n\nOtherwise, struct gfs2_sbd will be freed before gfs2_qd_dealloc (rcu\ncallback) has run for all gfs2_quota_data objects, resulting in\nuse-after-free.\n\nAlso, gfs2_destroy_threads() and gfs2_quota_cleanup() is already called\nby gfs2_make_fs_ro(), so in gfs2_put_super(), after calling\ngfs2_make_fs_ro(), there is no need to call them again.", id: "GHSA-rh24-q2xr-hfgm", modified: "2024-07-05T09:33:43Z", published: "2024-05-21T18:31:20Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52760", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08a28272faa750d4357ea2cb48d2baefd778ea81", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ad4e0a4f61c57c3ca291ee010a9d677d0199fba", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bdcb8aa434c6d36b5c215d02a9ef07551be25a37", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.