GHSA-RF9W-458J-7PQC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-25 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock

The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock.

A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free.

Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier().

The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64305"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:11Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncrypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock\n\nThe service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are\nadded or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but\nseveral functions iterate over the list without holding this lock.\n\nA concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call\ncould modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or\na use-after-free.\n\nFix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry()\niterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(),\nadf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(),\nadf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier().\n\nThe lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up()\nand adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no\nevent_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in\nthe reverse order.",
  "id": "GHSA-rf9w-458j-7pqc",
  "modified": "2026-07-25T12:31:30Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64305"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0dbcecea740d943002c1cbdafa39bdfc108e32a5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/222fa7b453b612f4407f260146d89a2ce2bc831d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c6f845e77ec35f9b7b047cc8f9789bf397cdd3e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c3c5925791cff3b84d313293fd60f384d877d793"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…