ghsa-r5f5-87f9-q46c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:53
Modified
2022-05-01 01:53
Details
The StgCompObjStream::Load function in OpenOffice.org OpenOffice 1.1.4 and earlier allocates memory based on 16 bit length values, but process memory using 32 bit values, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a DOC document with certain length values, which leads to a heap-based buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-0941" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The StgCompObjStream::Load function in OpenOffice.org OpenOffice 1.1.4 and earlier allocates memory based on 16 bit length values, but process memory using 32 bit values, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a DOC document with certain length values, which leads to a heap-based buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-r5f5-87f9-q46c", "modified": "2022-05-01T01:53:25Z", "published": "2022-05-01T01:53:25Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0941" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9106" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17027" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200504-13.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_21_sr.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46388" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-375.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/395516" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13092" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.