ghsa-qw97-54gm-4j6w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:09
Modified
2022-05-13 01:09
Severity ?
Details
Integer overflow in the strxfrm function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.21 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-8982" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-03-15T19:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer overflow in the strxfrm function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.21 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-qw97-54gm-4j6w", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:09:05Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:09:05Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8982" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16009" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=0f9e585480ed" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/13/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/14/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72602" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.