ghsa-qmh2-h7r6-gm6q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:54
Modified
2022-07-13 21:25
Summary
Client BlockTokens not checked in Apache Hadoop
Details
DataNodes in Apache Hadoop 2.0.0 alpha does not check the BlockTokens of clients when Kerberos is enabled and the DataNode has checked out the same BlockPool twice from a NodeName, which might allow remote clients to read arbitrary blocks, write to blocks to which they only have read access, and have other unspecified impacts.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-client" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.0.0-alpha" }, { "fixed": "2.0.1-alpha" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "2.0.0-alpha" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-3376" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2022-07-13T21:25:16Z", "nvd_published_at": "2012-07-12T19:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "DataNodes in Apache Hadoop 2.0.0 alpha does not check the BlockTokens of clients when Kerberos is enabled and the DataNode has checked out the same BlockPool twice from a NodeName, which might allow remote clients to read arbitrary blocks, write to blocks to which they only have read access, and have other unspecified impacts.", "id": "GHSA-qmh2-h7r6-gm6q", "modified": "2022-07-13T21:25:16Z", "published": "2022-05-17T02:54:07Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3376" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/apache/hadoop" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Jul/78" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.cloudera.com/documentation/other/security-bulletins/topics/csb_topic_1.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0049.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [], "summary": "Client BlockTokens not checked in Apache Hadoop" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.