ghsa-qccg-86w9-x648
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-11-21 21:33
Modified
2024-12-24 15:30
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Add sk_is_inet and IS_ICSK check in tls_sw_has_ctx_tx/rx

As the introduction of the support for vsock and unix sockets in sockmap, tls_sw_has_ctx_tx/rx cannot presume the socket passed in must be IS_ICSK. vsock and af_unix sockets have vsock_sock and unix_sock instead of inet_connection_sock. For these sockets, tls_get_ctx may return an invalid pointer and cause page fault in function tls_sw_ctx_rx.

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000040030 Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work RIP: 0010:sk_psock_strp_data_ready+0x23/0x60 Call Trace: ? __die+0x81/0xc3 ? no_context+0x194/0x350 ? do_page_fault+0x30/0x110 ? async_page_fault+0x3e/0x50 ? sk_psock_strp_data_ready+0x23/0x60 virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x750/0x800 ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x620 vsock_loopback_work+0xd0/0x100 process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360 worker_thread+0x30/0x390 ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0 kthread+0x112/0x130 ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40

v2: - Add IS_ICSK check v3: - Update the commits in Fixes

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2024-53091",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2024-11-21T19:15:12Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Add sk_is_inet and IS_ICSK check in tls_sw_has_ctx_tx/rx\n\nAs the introduction of the support for vsock and unix sockets in sockmap,\ntls_sw_has_ctx_tx/rx cannot presume the socket passed in must be IS_ICSK.\nvsock and af_unix sockets have vsock_sock and unix_sock instead of\ninet_connection_sock. For these sockets, tls_get_ctx may return an invalid\npointer and cause page fault in function tls_sw_ctx_rx.\n\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000040030\nWorkqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work\nRIP: 0010:sk_psock_strp_data_ready+0x23/0x60\nCall Trace:\n ? __die+0x81/0xc3\n ? no_context+0x194/0x350\n ? do_page_fault+0x30/0x110\n ? async_page_fault+0x3e/0x50\n ? sk_psock_strp_data_ready+0x23/0x60\n virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x750/0x800\n ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x620\n vsock_loopback_work+0xd0/0x100\n process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360\n worker_thread+0x30/0x390\n ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0\n kthread+0x112/0x130\n ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40\n ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40\n\nv2:\n  - Add IS_ICSK check\nv3:\n  - Update the commits in Fixes",
   id: "GHSA-qccg-86w9-x648",
   modified: "2024-12-24T15:30:31Z",
   published: "2024-11-21T21:33:32Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53091",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44d0469f79bd3d0b3433732877358df7dc6b17b1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6781cfa93a6a1b7f5be6819a5a2dd8f30f47ca26",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a078a480ff3f43d74d8a024ae10c3c7daf6db149",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.