ghsa-q4xh-9r6f-9fg6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:20
Modified
2023-02-27 18:33
Details

In IJG JPEG (aka libjpeg) before 9d, jpeg_mem_available() in jmemnobs.c in djpeg does not honor the max_memory_to_use setting, possibly causing excessive memory consumption.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2020-14152",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-400",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2020-06-15T17:15:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "In IJG JPEG (aka libjpeg) before 9d, jpeg_mem_available() in jmemnobs.c in djpeg does not honor the max_memory_to_use setting, possibly causing excessive memory consumption.",
   id: "GHSA-q4xh-9r6f-9fg6",
   modified: "2023-02-27T18:33:22Z",
   published: "2022-05-24T17:20:33Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14152",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugs.gentoo.org/727908",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/07/msg00033.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.ijg.org/files/jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.