ghsa-q3rr-g46f-jgqr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-02-19 21:31
Modified
2025-03-31 06:30
Details

A flaw was found in grub2. During the network boot process, when trying to search for the configuration file, grub copies data from a user controlled environment variable into an internal buffer using the grub_strcpy() function. During this step, it fails to consider the environment variable length when allocating the internal buffer, resulting in an out-of-bounds write. If correctly exploited, this issue may result in remote code execution through the same network segment grub is searching for the boot information, which can be used to by-pass secure boot protections.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2025-0624",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-787",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2025-02-19T19:15:15Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "A flaw was found in grub2. During the network boot process, when trying to search for the configuration file, grub copies data from a user controlled environment variable into an internal buffer using the grub_strcpy() function. During this step, it fails to consider the environment variable length when allocating the internal buffer, resulting in an out-of-bounds write. If correctly exploited, this issue may result in remote code execution through the same network segment grub is searching for the boot information, which can be used to by-pass secure boot protections.",
   id: "GHSA-q3rr-g46f-jgqr",
   modified: "2025-03-31T06:30:25Z",
   published: "2025-02-19T21:31:38Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0624",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2521",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2653",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2655",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2675",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2784",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2799",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2867",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2869",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3367",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3396",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0624",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346112",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.