ghsa-prxf-5xrr-96cp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-04-03 15:30
Modified
2023-04-08 03:30
Severity ?
Details
Reflected XSS (via AngularJS sandbox escape expressions) exists in Progress Ipswitch WS_FTP Server 8.6.0. This can lead to execution of malicious code and commands on the client due to improper handling of user-provided input. By inputting malicious payloads in the subdirectory searchbar or Add folder filename boxes, it is possible to execute client-side commands. For example, there is Client-Side Template Injection via subFolderPath to the ThinClient/WtmApiService.asmx/GetFileSubTree URI.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-27665" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-79" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2023-04-03T14:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Reflected XSS (via AngularJS sandbox escape expressions) exists in Progress Ipswitch WS_FTP Server 8.6.0. This can lead to execution of malicious code and commands on the client due to improper handling of user-provided input. By inputting malicious payloads in the subdirectory searchbar or Add folder filename boxes, it is possible to execute client-side commands. For example, there is Client-Side Template Injection via subFolderPath to the ThinClient/WtmApiService.asmx/GetFileSubTree URI.", "id": "GHSA-prxf-5xrr-96cp", "modified": "2023-04-08T03:30:25Z", "published": "2023-04-03T15:30:15Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27665" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://community.progress.com/s/article/WS-FTP-Server-Critical-Vulnerability-September-2023" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.ipswitch.com/WS_FTP_Server2020/ReleaseNotes/index.htm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/dievus/CVE-2022-27665" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.