ghsa-prx2-gh7q-w297
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 19:57
Modified
2024-04-04 00:00
Severity ?
Details
cn.wps.moffice.common.beans.print.CloudPrintWebView in Kingsoft Office 5.3.1, as used in Huawei P2 devices before V100R001C00B043, falls back to HTTP when the HTTPS connection to the registry fails, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct downgrade attacks and execute arbitrary Java code by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block HTTPS traffic.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-2271" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2020-01-14T17:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "cn.wps.moffice.common.beans.print.CloudPrintWebView in Kingsoft Office 5.3.1, as used in Huawei P2 devices before V100R001C00B043, falls back to HTTP when the HTTPS connection to the registry fails, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct downgrade attacks and execute arbitrary Java code by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block HTTPS traffic.", "id": "GHSA-prx2-gh7q-w297", "modified": "2024-04-04T00:00:01Z", "published": "2022-05-17T19:57:16Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-2271" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/99089" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://labs.f-secure.com/advisories/kingsoft-office-remote-code-execution" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://labs.f-secure.com/assets/763/original/mwri_advisory_huawei_kingsoft-office.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.huawei.com/en/security/psirt/security-bulletins/security-advisories/hw-401529.htm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71381" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.