ghsa-pm5g-66xr-995q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:31
Modified
2022-05-13 01:31
Severity ?
Details
Wago 750 Series PLCs with firmware version 10 and prior include a remote attack may take advantage of an improper implementation of the 3 way handshake during a TCP connection affecting the communications with commission and service tools. Specially crafted packets may also be sent to Port 2455/TCP/IP, used in Codesys management software, which may result in a denial-of-service condition of communications with commissioning and service tools.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-8836" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-404" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-04-03T13:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Wago 750 Series PLCs with firmware version 10 and prior include a remote attack may take advantage of an improper implementation of the 3 way handshake during a TCP connection affecting the communications with commission and service tools. Specially crafted packets may also be sent to Port 2455/TCP/IP, used in Codesys management software, which may result in a denial-of-service condition of communications with commissioning and service tools.", "id": "GHSA-pm5g-66xr-995q", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:31:48Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:31:48Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-8836" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-18-088-01" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.wago.com/medias/Vulnerability-in-the-WAGO-Ethernet-TCP-IP-driver.pdf?context=bWFzdGVyfHJvb3R8MjgxNDk0fGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL3BkZnxoOTcvaDhkLzkxNTAyMjMyMjA3NjYucGRmfGRlNWQ4ODc0NTE5M2UyNTUwNTIyNDRlOWFkNWI2YjNkMzg0YTVhYzlmYTBjNzM4MDdmNmYzOTM5M2ZlMGEzNzE" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103726" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.