ghsa-pjv6-3frr-mr92
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:43
Modified
2022-05-17 01:43
Details
Multiple integer overflows in the (1) _objalloc_alloc function in objalloc.c and (2) objalloc_alloc macro in include/objalloc.h in GNU libiberty, as used by binutils 2.22, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via vectors related to the "addition of CHUNK_HEADER_SIZE to the length," which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-3509" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-09-05T23:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Multiple integer overflows in the (1) _objalloc_alloc function in objalloc.c and (2) objalloc_alloc macro in include/objalloc.h in GNU libiberty, as used by binutils 2.22, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via vectors related to the \"addition of CHUNK_HEADER_SIZE to the length,\" which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-pjv6-3frr-mr92", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:43:58Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:43:58Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3509" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/78135" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54411" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01986.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-3509" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:029" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/29/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55281" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2496-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.