ghsa-p8wr-r5ww-35j3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-02-05 06:30
Modified
2024-02-05 06:30
Details

Vintage, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API create_overlay.cgi did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible remote code execution. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator-privileged service account. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-5800"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-35",
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-05T06:15:46Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Vintage,\nmember of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API create_overlay.cgi\ndid not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible remote code\nexecution. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an\noperator- or administrator-privileged service account. Axis has released patched AXIS OS\nversions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory\nfor more information and solution.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-p8wr-r5ww-35j3",
  "modified": "2024-02-05T06:30:30Z",
  "published": "2024-02-05T06:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5800"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.axis.com/dam/public/89/d9/99/cve-2023-5800-en-US-424339.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.