ghsa-p87w-4hv9-gm3f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-08-17 12:30
Modified
2024-08-17 12:30
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

s390/uv: Don't call folio_wait_writeback() without a folio reference

folio_wait_writeback() requires that no spinlocks are held and that a folio reference is held, as documented. After we dropped the PTL, the folio could get freed concurrently. So grab a temporary reference.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-43832"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-17T10:15:08Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/uv: Don\u0027t call folio_wait_writeback() without a folio reference\n\nfolio_wait_writeback() requires that no spinlocks are held and that\na folio reference is held, as documented. After we dropped the PTL, the\nfolio could get freed concurrently. So grab a temporary reference.",
  "id": "GHSA-p87w-4hv9-gm3f",
  "modified": "2024-08-17T12:30:32Z",
  "published": "2024-08-17T12:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43832"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a1eb2f3fc453dcd52726d13e863938561489cb7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f29f6537f54d74e64bac0a390fb2e26da25800d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8736604ef53359a718c246087cd21dcec232d2fb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b21aba72aadd94bdac275deab021fc84d6c72b16"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.