ghsa-p673-9wxq-39cc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:54
Modified
2022-05-14 02:54
Details

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2011-2738",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2011-09-19T12:02:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow.",
   id: "GHSA-p673-9wxq-39cc",
   modified: "2022-05-14T02:54:57Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T02:54:57Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2738",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/69828",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/45979",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46016",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46052",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46053",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b9351e.shtml",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b9351f.shtml",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.osvdb.org/75442",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/519646/100/0/threaded",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49627",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49644",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026046",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026047",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026048",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026059",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.