ghsa-mmm5-f82c-58j8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:01
Modified
2025-02-06 15:32
Severity ?
Details
The administrator application on ASUS GT-AC2900 devices before 3.0.0.4.386.42643 allows authentication bypass when processing remote input from an unauthenticated user, leading to unauthorized access to the administrator interface. This relates to handle_request in router/httpd/httpd.c and auth_check in web_hook.o. An attacker-supplied value of '\0' matches the device's default value of '\0' in some situations.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-32030", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-287", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-05-06T15:15:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "The administrator application on ASUS GT-AC2900 devices before 3.0.0.4.386.42643 allows authentication bypass when processing remote input from an unauthenticated user, leading to unauthorized access to the administrator interface. This relates to handle_request in router/httpd/httpd.c and auth_check in web_hook.o. An attacker-supplied value of '\\0' matches the device's default value of '\\0' in some situations.", id: "GHSA-mmm5-f82c-58j8", modified: "2025-02-06T15:32:51Z", published: "2022-05-24T19:01:29Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32030", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/atredispartners/advisories/blob/master/ATREDIS-2020-0010.md", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.asus.com/Networking-IoT-Servers/WiFi-Routers/ASUS-Gaming-Routers/RT-AC2900/HelpDesk_BIOS", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.asus.com/us/supportonly/lyra%20mini/helpdesk_bios", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.atredis.com/blog/2021/4/30/asus-authentication-bypass", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.