ghsa-mm9p-48xr-prf2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:26
Modified
2022-05-17 02:26
Severity ?
Details
The aio_mount function in fs/aio.c in the Linux kernel before 4.7.7 does not properly restrict execute access, which makes it easier for local users to bypass intended SELinux W^X policy restrictions, and consequently gain privileges, via an io_setup system call.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-10044", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-02-07T07:59:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "The aio_mount function in fs/aio.c in the Linux kernel before 4.7.7 does not properly restrict execute access, which makes it easier for local users to bypass intended SELinux W^X policy restrictions, and consequently gain privileges, via an io_setup system call.", id: "GHSA-mm9p-48xr-prf2", modified: "2022-05-17T02:26:55Z", published: "2022-05-17T02:26:55Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10044", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/22f6b4d34fcf039c63a94e7670e0da24f8575a5a", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=22f6b4d34fcf039c63a94e7670e0da24f8575a5a", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2017-02-01.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.7.7", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96122", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037798", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.