ghsa-mhrx-3jhc-rg45
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:37
Modified
2022-05-01 06:37
Details

Buffer overflow in termsh on SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long -o command line argument. NOTE: this is probably a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-0351 since it involves a distinct attack vector.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-0072"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-01-04T00:03:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in termsh on SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long -o command line argument.  NOTE: this is probably a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-0351 since it involves a distinct attack vector.",
  "id": "GHSA-mhrx-3jhc-rg45",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T06:37:14Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:37:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0072"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/Openserver_bof.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420677"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16122"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.