ghsa-m24p-rj9w-p9gr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:53
Modified
2022-05-02 03:53
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in RealNetworks RealPlayer 10, RealPlayer 10.5 6.0.12.1040 through 6.0.12.1741, RealPlayer 11 11.0.0 through 11.0.4, RealPlayer Enterprise, Mac RealPlayer 10 and 10.1, Linux RealPlayer 10, and Helix Player 10.x allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a file with invalid ASMRuleBook structures that trigger heap memory corruption.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-4241" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-01-25T19:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in RealNetworks RealPlayer 10, RealPlayer 10.5 6.0.12.1040 through 6.0.12.1741, RealPlayer 11 11.0.0 through 11.0.4, RealPlayer Enterprise, Mac RealPlayer 10 and 10.1, Linux RealPlayer 10, and Helix Player 10.x allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a file with invalid ASMRuleBook structures that trigger heap memory corruption.", "id": "GHSA-m24p-rj9w-p9gr", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:53:06Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:53:06Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4241" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/55794" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/38218" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023489" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://service.real.com/realplayer/security/01192010_player/en" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/509100/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37880" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0178" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-005" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.