ghsa-jrrp-87j9-7387
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:24
Modified
2022-05-17 00:24
Severity ?
Details
In the PatternMatch function in fontfile/fontdir.c in libXfont through 1.5.2 and 2.x before 2.0.2, an attacker with access to an X connection can cause a buffer over-read during pattern matching of fonts, leading to information disclosure or a crash (denial of service). This occurs because '\0' characters are incorrectly skipped in situations involving ? characters.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-13720" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-125" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-10-11T17:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In the PatternMatch function in fontfile/fontdir.c in libXfont through 1.5.2 and 2.x before 2.0.2, an attacker with access to an X connection can cause a buffer over-read during pattern matching of fonts, leading to information disclosure or a crash (denial of service). This occurs because \u0027\\0\u0027 characters are incorrectly skipped in situations involving ? characters.", "id": "GHSA-jrrp-87j9-7387", "modified": "2022-05-17T00:24:43Z", "published": "2022-05-17T00:24:43Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-13720" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500690" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054285" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXfont/commit/?id=d1e670a4a8704b8708e493ab6155589bcd570608" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-08" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.x.org/releases/individual/lib/libXfont2-2.0.2.tar.bz2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3995" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.