ghsa-jqxq-7f92-m7ww
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-03-11 00:31
Modified
2025-03-11 03:30
Severity ?
Details
Crypt::Random Perl package 1.05 through 1.55 may use rand() function, which is not cryptographically strong, for cryptographic functions.
Crypt::Random::rand 1.05 through 1.55 uses the rand() function. If the Provider is not specified and /dev/urandom or an Entropy Gathering Daemon (egd) service is not available Crypt::Random will default to use the insecure Crypt::Random::rand provider.
In particular, Windows versions of perl will encounter this issue by default.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2025-1828", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-338", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2025-03-11T00:15:11Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Crypt::Random Perl package 1.05 through 1.55 may use rand() function, which is not cryptographically strong, for cryptographic functions.\n\nCrypt::Random::rand 1.05 through 1.55 uses the rand() function. If the Provider is not specified and /dev/urandom or an Entropy Gathering Daemon (egd) service is not available Crypt::Random will default to use the insecure Crypt::Random::rand provider.\n\nIn particular, Windows versions of perl will encounter this issue by default.", id: "GHSA-jqxq-7f92-m7ww", modified: "2025-03-11T03:30:49Z", published: "2025-03-11T00:31:49Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1828", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/perl-Crypt-OpenPGP/Crypt-Random/pull/1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/perl-Crypt-OpenPGP/Crypt-Random/commit/1f8b29e9e89d8d083fd025152e76ec918136cc05", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://perldoc.perl.org/functions/rand", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.