ghsa-jqhc-vmcp-q22q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:13
Modified
2022-05-02 03:13
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the VMnc media codec in vmnc.dll in VMware Movie Decoder before 6.5.3 build 185404, VMware Workstation 6.5.x before 6.5.3 build 185404, VMware Player 2.5.x before 2.5.3 build 185404, and VMware ACE 2.5.x before 2.5.3 build 185404 on Windows might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a video file with crafted dimensions (aka framebuffer parameters).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-0199" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-09-08T22:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the VMnc media codec in vmnc.dll in VMware Movie Decoder before 6.5.3 build 185404, VMware Workstation 6.5.x before 6.5.3 build 185404, VMware Player 2.5.x before 2.5.3 build 185404, and VMware ACE 2.5.x before 2.5.3 build 185404 on Windows might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a video file with crafted dimensions (aka framebuffer parameters).", "id": "GHSA-jqhc-vmcp-q22q", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:13:28Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:13:28Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0199" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2009/000065.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34938" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-25" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/506286/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36290" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2009-0012.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2553" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.