GHSA-JM9W-MMF5-G697
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-25 12:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: destroy seen inode bitmap when we fail to add a dirpath
LOLLM observes a memory leak in xchk_dirtree_create_path if we create the directory path object but appending the name to the path fails. When this happens, we don't tear down the (empty) seen inode bitmap. This is a pretty trivial error, but let's not leave logic bombs.
Do the same for a similar bug in xrep_dirtree_create_adoption_path.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-97543"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T11:17:04Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfs: destroy seen inode bitmap when we fail to add a dirpath\n\nLOLLM observes a memory leak in xchk_dirtree_create_path if we create\nthe directory path object but appending the name to the path fails.\nWhen this happens, we don\u0027t tear down the (empty) seen inode bitmap.\nThis is a pretty trivial error, but let\u0027s not leave logic bombs.\n\nDo the same for a similar bug in xrep_dirtree_create_adoption_path.",
"id": "GHSA-jm9w-mmf5-g697",
"modified": "2026-09-25T12:31:23Z",
"published": "2026-09-25T12:31:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97543"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b756de8167f2f06ffceadc71cb17c1fc7be4be8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a441c6842da75c5b862cc1c9f7969d6a93b54b9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b10ca4302ee2dda4233f70b2033883ee376fa6a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/582f54dce62043f7a0503ab8c76d718d0293da59"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.