ghsa-jf9j-9gh2-gp45
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:51
Modified
2022-05-17 00:51
Details
Integer overflow in the gs_heap_alloc_bytes function in base/gsmalloc.c in Ghostscript 9.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted Postscript (ps) file, as demonstrated by using the ps2pdf command, which triggers an out-of-bounds read or write.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-3228" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-08-11T14:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Integer overflow in the gs_heap_alloc_bytes function in base/gsmalloc.c in Ghostscript 9.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted Postscript (ps) file, as demonstrated by using the ps2pdf command, which triggers an out-of-bounds read or write.", "id": "GHSA-jf9j-9gh2-gp45", "modified": "2022-05-17T00:51:50Z", "published": "2022-05-17T00:51:50Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3228" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232805" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-33" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696041" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696070" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0c0b0859" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/23/14" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3326" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76017" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033149" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2697-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.