ghsa-j9q5-gh3m-3cf9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-16 00:30
Modified
2024-04-16 00:30
Severity ?
Details
vertaai/modeldb is vulnerable to a path traversal attack due to improper sanitization of user-supplied file paths in its file upload functionality. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to write arbitrary files anywhere in the file system by manipulating the 'artifact_path' parameter. This flaw can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) by overwriting critical files, such as the application's configuration file, especially when the application is run outside of Docker. The vulnerability is present in the NFSController.java and NFSService.java components of the application.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-1961" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-22" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-16T00:15:10Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "vertaai/modeldb is vulnerable to a path traversal attack due to improper sanitization of user-supplied file paths in its file upload functionality. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to write arbitrary files anywhere in the file system by manipulating the \u0027artifact_path\u0027 parameter. This flaw can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) by overwriting critical files, such as the application\u0027s configuration file, especially when the application is run outside of Docker. The vulnerability is present in the NFSController.java and NFSService.java components of the application.", "id": "GHSA-j9q5-gh3m-3cf9", "modified": "2024-04-16T00:30:33Z", "published": "2024-04-16T00:30:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1961" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/5f602914-3e5d-407a-b8ce-fb444a4e8bb3" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.