GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-J5WF-CPJP-5VX9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-08-27 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

libceph: fix OOB read in decode_watchers() via missing bounds check

ceph_start_decoding() validates that struct_len bytes remain in the buffer after the encoding header, but accepts struct_len=0 as valid: ceph_decode_need(p, end, 0, bad) always passes. When a malicious or compromised OSD sends an obj_list_watch_response_t reply with struct_len=0, ceph_start_decoding() returns success with p == end, leaving zero bytes guaranteed for subsequent reads.

The immediately following ceph_decode_32(p) in decode_watchers() has no preceding bounds check. With p == end this is a 4-byte read past the validated buffer boundary. The garbage value is then passed directly to kzalloc_objs() as the watcher count.

The sibling function decode_watcher() already uses the safe variants (ceph_decode_copy_safe, ceph_decode_64_safe, ceph_decode_skip_32) after its own ceph_start_decoding() call. decode_watchers() is the only site that uses the bare variant, confirming an oversight.

Fix by replacing ceph_decode_32(p) with ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_watchers, bad), consistent with the established pattern.

Attacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph deployment (e.g. cloud) can trigger this against any kernel client that calls CEPH_OSD_OP_LIST_WATCHERS, without any further privileges beyond OSD session establishment.

[ idryomov: trim changelog ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80557"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-26T15:17:10Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlibceph: fix OOB read in decode_watchers() via missing bounds check\n\nceph_start_decoding() validates that struct_len bytes remain in the\nbuffer after the encoding header, but accepts struct_len=0 as valid:\nceph_decode_need(p, end, 0, bad) always passes. When a malicious or\ncompromised OSD sends an obj_list_watch_response_t reply with\nstruct_len=0, ceph_start_decoding() returns success with p == end,\nleaving zero bytes guaranteed for subsequent reads.\n\nThe immediately following ceph_decode_32(p) in decode_watchers() has\nno preceding bounds check. With p == end this is a 4-byte read past\nthe validated buffer boundary. The garbage value is then passed\ndirectly to kzalloc_objs() as the watcher count.\n\nThe sibling function decode_watcher() already uses the safe variants\n(ceph_decode_copy_safe, ceph_decode_64_safe, ceph_decode_skip_32)\nafter its own ceph_start_decoding() call. decode_watchers() is the\nonly site that uses the bare variant, confirming an oversight.\n\nFix by replacing ceph_decode_32(p) with ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end,\n*num_watchers, bad), consistent with the established pattern.\n\nAttacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph\ndeployment (e.g. cloud) can trigger this against any kernel client\nthat calls CEPH_OSD_OP_LIST_WATCHERS, without any further privileges\nbeyond OSD session establishment.\n\n[ idryomov: trim changelog ]",
  "id": "GHSA-j5wf-cpjp-5vx9",
  "modified": "2026-08-27T15:31:32Z",
  "published": "2026-08-27T06:31:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80557"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00ead17c7de137a692edee59f2772e6af687e8eb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c824e7c75bb4adf19553dd4ea944a5d83096be8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7130d94846dadbb97b6b7f4d78a3a7bba6e3daa1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85479b7d65b4ebcb07fbbe57230976793974ab4a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c59219a6b62d74936963983e5815524c3de8dd79"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb8246e5846dbbe34930903a90c7a90dd8e5910b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eab3eeb68bfc639d74f27256f05546af5c4f787d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f161be39201eb5f9b1f58fb8f90b8a9cd3931eb6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…