GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-J54F-72M2-VVMR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-01 15:30 – Updated: 2026-06-01 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is needed

Unloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs would trigger the dput() double-drop warning:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410

Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned in Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn't the right approach here, and leads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate() and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that can never happen.


Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-27389"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-415"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-01T13:15:51Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is needed\n\nUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs would\ntrigger the dput() double-drop warning:\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410\n\nUsing the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned in\nDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn\u0027t the right approach here, and\nleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()\nand update the code to not bother checking for error codes that can\nnever happen.\n\n---",
  "id": "GHSA-j54f-72m2-vvmr",
  "modified": "2026-06-01T18:31:18Z",
  "published": "2024-05-01T15:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27389"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/340682ed1932b8e3bd0bfc6c31a0c6354eb57cc6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cdf9006fc095af71da80e9b5f48a32e991b9ed3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a43e0fc5e9134a46515de2f2f8d4100b74e50de3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb9e802e49c24eeb3af35e9e8c04d526f35f112a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0ee2a8adb6673382cce8a4280e1ca0849b3b783"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db6e5e16f1ee9e3b01d2f71c7f0ba945f4bf0f4e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…