ghsa-hq79-cp3f-mcr5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:03
Modified
2022-05-01 02:03
Details
Gaim before 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed MSN message that leads to a memory allocation of a large size, possibly due to an integer signedness error.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-1934" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-05-19T04:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Gaim before 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed MSN message that leads to a memory allocation of a large size, possibly due to an integer signedness error.", "id": "GHSA-hq79-cp3f-mcr5", "modified": "2022-05-01T02:03:20Z", "published": "2022-05-01T02:03:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1934" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10368" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A263" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200506-11.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail\u0026aid=1205290\u0026group_id=235\u0026atid=100235" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-734" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:099" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_36_sudo.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-518.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426078/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13932" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.