ghsa-hhm6-jjf4-6pm3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-03-19 09:30
Modified
2025-03-25 20:16
Severity ?
6.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
Apache Airflow MySQL Provider is Vulnerable to SQL Injection
Details

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache Airflow MySQL Provider.

When user triggered a DAG with dump_sql or load_sql functions they could pass a table parameter from a UI, that could cause SQL injection by running SQL that was not intended. It could lead to data corruption, modification and others. This issue affects Apache Airflow MySQL Provider: before 6.2.0.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.0, which fixes the issue.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "PyPI",
            name: "apache-airflow-providers-mysql",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "6.2.0",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2025-27018",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-89",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2025-03-19T15:48:17Z",
      nvd_published_at: "2025-03-19T09:15:14Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache Airflow MySQL Provider.\n\nWhen user triggered a DAG with dump_sql or load_sql functions they could pass a table parameter from a UI, that could cause SQL injection by running SQL that was not intended.\nIt could lead to data corruption, modification and others.\nThis issue affects Apache Airflow MySQL Provider: before 6.2.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.0, which fixes the issue.",
   id: "GHSA-hhm6-jjf4-6pm3",
   modified: "2025-03-25T20:16:20Z",
   published: "2025-03-19T09:30:27Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-27018",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47254",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47255",
      },
      {
         type: "PACKAGE",
         url: "https://github.com/apache/airflow",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/m8ohgkwz4mq9njohf66sjwqjdy28gvzf",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/19/4",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
      {
         score: "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
         type: "CVSS_V4",
      },
   ],
   summary: "Apache Airflow MySQL Provider is Vulnerable to SQL Injection",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.