ghsa-h964-f4gx-gw3x
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-08-26 06:30
Modified
2024-08-26 18:33
Severity ?
Details
Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the client side) to trigger unnecessarily expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. The client may cause asymmetric resource consumption. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE and validate the order of the public key.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-41996" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-295" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-26T06:15:04Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the client side) to trigger unnecessarily expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. The client may cause asymmetric resource consumption. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE and validate the order of the public key.", "id": "GHSA-h964-f4gx-gw3x", "modified": "2024-08-26T18:33:33Z", "published": "2024-08-26T06:30:46Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41996" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/details" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/faq" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gist.github.com/c0r0n3r/abccc14d4d96c0442f3a77fa5ca255d1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.