GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-H283-RR2H-W2JJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-01 09:30 – Updated: 2025-12-12 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/userfaultfd: fix kmap_local LIFO ordering for CONFIG_HIGHPTE

With CONFIG_HIGHPTE on 32-bit ARM, move_pages_pte() maps PTE pages using kmap_local_page(), which requires unmapping in Last-In-First-Out order.

The current code maps dst_pte first, then src_pte, but unmaps them in the same order (dst_pte, src_pte), violating the LIFO requirement. This causes the warning in kunmap_local_indexed():

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 604 at mm/highmem.c:622 kunmap_local_indexed+0x178/0x17c addr != __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx)

Fix this by reversing the unmap order to respect LIFO ordering.

This issue follows the same pattern as similar fixes: - commit eca6828403b8 ("crypto: skcipher - fix mismatch between mapping and unmapping order") - commit 8cf57c6df818 ("nilfs2: eliminate staggered calls to kunmap in nilfs_rename")

Both of which addressed the same fundamental requirement that kmap_local operations must follow LIFO ordering.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-39899"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-01T08:15:32Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/userfaultfd: fix kmap_local LIFO ordering for CONFIG_HIGHPTE\n\nWith CONFIG_HIGHPTE on 32-bit ARM, move_pages_pte() maps PTE pages using\nkmap_local_page(), which requires unmapping in Last-In-First-Out order.\n\nThe current code maps dst_pte first, then src_pte, but unmaps them in the\nsame order (dst_pte, src_pte), violating the LIFO requirement.  This\ncauses the warning in kunmap_local_indexed():\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 604 at mm/highmem.c:622 kunmap_local_indexed+0x178/0x17c\n  addr \\!= __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx)\n\nFix this by reversing the unmap order to respect LIFO ordering.\n\nThis issue follows the same pattern as similar fixes:\n- commit eca6828403b8 (\"crypto: skcipher - fix mismatch between mapping and unmapping order\")\n- commit 8cf57c6df818 (\"nilfs2: eliminate staggered calls to kunmap in nilfs_rename\")\n\nBoth of which addressed the same fundamental requirement that kmap_local\noperations must follow LIFO ordering.",
  "id": "GHSA-h283-rr2h-w2jj",
  "modified": "2025-12-12T21:31:33Z",
  "published": "2025-10-01T09:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39899"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9614d8bee66387501f48718fa306e17f2aa3f2f3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b051f707018967ea8f697d790a1ed8c443f63812"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd1ee62759d0bd4d6b909731c076c230ac89d61e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…