ghsa-gvvc-pv9r-rg5q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:07
Modified
2022-05-24 17:07
Details

The daemon in Tor through 0.4.1.8 and 0.4.2.x through 0.4.2.6 does not verify that a rendezvous node is known before attempting to connect to it, which might make it easier for remote attackers to discover circuit information.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-8516"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-02-02T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The daemon in Tor through 0.4.1.8 and 0.4.2.x through 0.4.2.6 does not verify that a rendezvous node is known before attempting to connect to it, which might make it easier for remote attackers to discover circuit information.",
  "id": "GHSA-gvvc-pv9r-rg5q",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:07:52Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:07:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8516"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-February/014146.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-February/014147.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-8516"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33129"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/868-Deanonymizing-Tor-Circuits.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.