ghsa-grpf-5hh7-jc9q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:19
Modified
2022-05-24 17:19
Details
rejetto HFS (aka HTTP File Server) v2.3m Build #300, when virtual files or folders are used, allows remote attackers to trigger an invalid-pointer write access violation via concurrent HTTP requests with a long URI or long HTTP headers.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-13432" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2020-06-08T18:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "rejetto HFS (aka HTTP File Server) v2.3m Build #300, when virtual files or folders are used, allows remote attackers to trigger an invalid-pointer write access violation via concurrent HTTP requests with a long URI or long HTTP headers.", "id": "GHSA-grpf-5hh7-jc9q", "modified": "2022-05-24T17:19:33Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:19:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13432" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/rejetto/hfs2/commit/b8ebfc4e22948e1a61506cd66e397b61ea5ea5de" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157980/HFS-Http-File-Server-2.3m-Build-300-Buffer-Overflow.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.rejetto.com/hfs/?f=wn" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://hyp3rlinx.altervista.org/advisories/HFS-HTTP-FILE-SERVER-v2.3-REMOTE-BUFFER-OVERFLOW-DoS.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157980/HFS-Http-File-Server-2.3m-Build-300-Buffer-Overflow.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Jun/13" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Apr/12" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.