GHSA-GR86-25PQ-RHR2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-12 00:31 – Updated: 2026-08-14 00:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: don't propagate EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING to split extent maps

When btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() splits an extent map, the new split maps inherit the original map's flags through a local 'flags' variable. Commit f86f7a75e2fb ("btrfs: use the flags of an extent map to identify the compression type") changed the EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING clearing to operate on em->flags instead of that local 'flags' copy, so a split of an extent map that is currently being logged wrongly inherits EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING.

The flag is then never cleared on the split, and when it is freed while still on the inode's modified_extents list (for example by the extent map shrinker) it trips the WARN_ON(!list_empty(&em->list)) in btrfs_free_extent_map() and leads to a use-after-free.

Clear EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING from the local 'flags' copy used for the splits and only clear EXTENT_FLAG_PINNED from em->flags, restoring the behaviour prior to f86f7a75e2fb.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68442"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-12T00:17:44Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: don\u0027t propagate EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING to split extent maps\n\nWhen btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() splits an extent map, the new split\nmaps inherit the original map\u0027s flags through a local \u0027flags\u0027 variable.\nCommit f86f7a75e2fb (\"btrfs: use the flags of an extent map to identify\nthe compression type\") changed the EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING clearing to\noperate on em-\u003eflags instead of that local \u0027flags\u0027 copy, so a split of\nan extent map that is currently being logged wrongly inherits\nEXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING.\n\nThe flag is then never cleared on the split, and when it is freed while\nstill on the inode\u0027s modified_extents list (for example by the extent\nmap shrinker) it trips the WARN_ON(!list_empty(\u0026em-\u003elist)) in\nbtrfs_free_extent_map() and leads to a use-after-free.\n\nClear EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING from the local \u0027flags\u0027 copy used for the\nsplits and only clear EXTENT_FLAG_PINNED from em-\u003eflags, restoring the\nbehaviour prior to f86f7a75e2fb.",
  "id": "GHSA-gr86-25pq-rhr2",
  "modified": "2026-08-14T00:31:58Z",
  "published": "2026-08-12T00:31:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68442"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e465c63f103a5ce6849614d6bda048d70eebec8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a9246a424f45f33a1b8367052611ebe874868ad"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5eff4d5b17fa1950e80bfd1ba43dc0699e61a644"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9304713b70e7e1450e3a76e758836fe5391bfa95"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…