GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-GPX7-7C62-M3G8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-12 03:30 – Updated: 2024-01-12 03:30
VLAI
Details

A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).

In a Juniper Flow Monitoring (jflow) scenario route churn that causes BGP next hops to be updated will cause a slow memory leak and eventually a crash and restart of rpd.

Thread level memory utilization for the areas where the leak occurs can be checked using the below command:

user@host> show task memory detail | match so_in so_in6 28 32 344450 11022400 344760 11032320 so_in 8 16 1841629 29466064 1841734 29467744 This issue affects:

Junos OS

  • 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3;
  • 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3;
  • 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3.

Junos OS Evolved

  • 21.4-EVO versions earlier than 21.4R3-EVO;
  • 22.1-EVO versions earlier than 22.1R3-EVO;
  • 22.2-EVO versions earlier than 22.2R3-EVO.

This issue does not affect:

Juniper Networks Junos OS versions earlier than 21.4R1.

Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions earlier than 21.4R1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-21611"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-401"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-01-12T01:15:49Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "\nA Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nIn a Juniper Flow Monitoring (jflow) scenario route churn that causes BGP next hops to be updated will cause a slow memory leak and eventually a crash and restart of rpd.\n\nThread level memory utilization for the areas where the leak occurs can be checked using the below command:\n\nuser@host\u003e show task memory detail | match so_in\nso_in6 28 32 344450 11022400 344760 11032320\nso_in 8 16 1841629 29466064 1841734 29467744\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS\n\n\n\n  *  21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3;\n  *  22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3;\n  *  22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3.\n\n\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved\n\n\n\n  *  21.4-EVO versions earlier than 21.4R3-EVO;\n  *  22.1-EVO versions earlier than 22.1R3-EVO;\n  *  22.2-EVO versions earlier than 22.2R3-EVO.\n\n\n\n\nThis issue does not affect:\n\nJuniper Networks Junos OS versions earlier than 21.4R1.\n\nJuniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions earlier than 21.4R1.\n\n\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-gpx7-7c62-m3g8",
  "modified": "2024-01-12T03:30:49Z",
  "published": "2024-01-12T03:30:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21611"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75752"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…