ghsa-gp7r-m4cc-qhwq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-01-14 18:32
Modified
2025-03-11 06:30
Severity ?
Details
A flaw was found in rsync. This vulnerability arises from a race condition during rsync's handling of symbolic links. Rsync's default behavior when encountering symbolic links is to skip them. If an attacker replaced a regular file with a symbolic link at the right time, it was possible to bypass the default behavior and traverse symbolic links. Depending on the privileges of the rsync process, an attacker could leak sensitive information, potentially leading to privilege escalation.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-12747", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-362", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2025-01-14T18:15:25Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "A flaw was found in rsync. This vulnerability arises from a race condition during rsync's handling of symbolic links. Rsync's default behavior when encountering symbolic links is to skip them. If an attacker replaced a regular file with a symbolic link at the right time, it was possible to bypass the default behavior and traverse symbolic links. Depending on the privileges of the rsync process, an attacker could leak sensitive information, potentially leading to privilege escalation.", id: "GHSA-gp7r-m4cc-qhwq", modified: "2025-03-11T06:30:37Z", published: "2025-01-14T18:32:00Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12747", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2600", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12747", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332968", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/952657", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.