ghsa-gh68-jm46-84rf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-02-04 21:30
Modified
2024-06-14 15:31
Severity ?
Details
libexpat through 2.5.0 allows a denial of service (resource consumption) because many full reparsings are required in the case of a large token for which multiple buffer fills are needed.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2023-52425", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-400", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-02-04T20:15:46Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "libexpat through 2.5.0 allows a denial of service (resource consumption) because many full reparsings are required in the case of a large token for which multiple buffer fills are needed.", id: "GHSA-gh68-jm46-84rf", modified: "2024-06-14T15:31:24Z", published: "2024-02-04T21:30:43Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52425", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/789", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/04/msg00006.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PNRIHC7DVVRAIWFRGV23Y6UZXFBXSQDB", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WNUBSGZFEZOBHJFTAD42SAN4ATW2VEMV", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240614-0003", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/20/5", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.