ghsa-fhvj-crp7-xfjw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:21
Modified
2022-05-24 19:21
Severity ?
Details
GraphicsMagick 1.3.26 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability found in the "Display visual image directory" feature of the DescribeImage() function of the magick/describe.c file. One possible way to trigger the vulnerability is to run the identify command on a specially crafted MIFF format file with the verbose flag.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-16352" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-11-01T15:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "GraphicsMagick 1.3.26 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability found in the \"Display visual image directory\" feature of the DescribeImage() function of the magick/describe.c file. One possible way to trigger the vulnerability is to run the identify command on a specially crafted MIFF format file with the verbose flag.", "id": "GHSA-fhvj-crp7-xfjw", "modified": "2022-05-24T19:21:20Z", "published": "2022-05-24T19:21:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16352" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/3494" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00002.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00002.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4232-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4321" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43111" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://hg.graphicsmagick.org/hg/GraphicsMagick?cmd=changeset;node=7292230dd185" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101658" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.