ghsa-fh85-pv2m-cvhw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 17:59
Modified
2022-05-01 17:59
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in the ESA protocol implementation in eIQnetworks Enterprise Security Analyzer (ESA) 2.5 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long parameter to the (1) DELETESEARCHFOLDER, (2) DELTASK, (3) HMGR_CHECKHOSTSCSV, (4) TASKUPDATEDUSER, (5) VERIFYUSERKEY, or (6) VERIFYPWD command.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-2059"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-04-18T03:19:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in the ESA protocol implementation in eIQnetworks Enterprise Security Analyzer (ESA) 2.5 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long parameter to the (1) DELETESEARCHFOLDER, (2) DELTASK, (3) HMGR_CHECKHOSTSCSV, (4) TASKUPDATEDUSER, (5) VERIFYUSERKEY, or (6) VERIFYPWD command.",
  "id": "GHSA-fh85-pv2m-cvhw",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T17:59:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T17:59:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2059"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33646"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24881"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.infigo.hr/en/in_focus/advisories/INFIGO-2007-04-05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/465488/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1380"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.