ghsa-ffr7-pf5x-4wg9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:56
Modified
2022-05-14 02:56
Details
The TextXtra.x32 module in Adobe Shockwave Player before 11.5.9.620 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a Director file with a crafted DEMX RIFF chunk that triggers incorrect buffer allocation, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4093, CVE-2010-4187, CVE-2010-4190, CVE-2010-4191, CVE-2010-4192, and CVE-2010-4306.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-0555" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-02-10T16:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The TextXtra.x32 module in Adobe Shockwave Player before 11.5.9.620 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a Director file with a crafted DEMX RIFF chunk that triggers incorrect buffer allocation, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4093, CVE-2010-4187, CVE-2010-4190, CVE-2010-4191, CVE-2010-4192, and CVE-2010-4306.", "id": "GHSA-ffr7-pf5x-4wg9", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:56:35Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:56:35Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0555" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65257" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/advisory/TPTI-11-02" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb11-01.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/516333/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46327" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025056" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0335" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.