ghsa-ffr2-cfrp-v9pj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:50
Modified
2022-05-17 05:50
Details

mod_ibm_ssl in IBM HTTP Server 6.0 before 6.0.2.43, 6.1 before 6.1.0.33, and 7.0 before 7.0.0.11, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) on z/OS, does not properly handle a large HTTP request body in uploading over SSL, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon fail) via an upload.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-2327"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-06-18T18:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "mod_ibm_ssl in IBM HTTP Server 6.0 before 6.0.2.43, 6.1 before 6.1.0.33, and 7.0 before 7.0.0.11, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) on z/OS, does not properly handle a large HTTP request body in uploading over SSL, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon fail) via an upload.",
  "id": "GHSA-ffr2-cfrp-v9pj",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:50:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:50:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2327"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/40096"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM10270"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM15830"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/65439"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1411"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.