ghsa-ffr2-cfrp-v9pj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:50
Modified
2022-05-17 05:50
Details
mod_ibm_ssl in IBM HTTP Server 6.0 before 6.0.2.43, 6.1 before 6.1.0.33, and 7.0 before 7.0.0.11, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) on z/OS, does not properly handle a large HTTP request body in uploading over SSL, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon fail) via an upload.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-2327" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-06-18T18:30:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "mod_ibm_ssl in IBM HTTP Server 6.0 before 6.0.2.43, 6.1 before 6.1.0.33, and 7.0 before 7.0.0.11, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) on z/OS, does not properly handle a large HTTP request body in uploading over SSL, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon fail) via an upload.", "id": "GHSA-ffr2-cfrp-v9pj", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:50:09Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:50:08Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2327" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/40096" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM10270" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM15830" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/65439" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1411" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.