ghsa-f846-7hhm-3qxh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:52
Modified
2022-05-17 00:52
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Buffer overflow in Cisco NX-OS on Nexus 1000V devices for VMware vSphere 7.3(0)ZN(0.9); Nexus 3000 devices 6.0(2)U5(1.41), 7.0(3)I2(0.373), and 7.3(0)ZN(0.83); Nexus 4000 devices 4.1(2)E1(1b); Nexus 7000 devices 6.2(14)S1; Nexus 9000 devices 7.3(0)ZN(0.9); and MDS 9000 devices 6.2 (13) and 7.1(0)ZN(91.99) and MDS SAN-OS 7.1(0)ZN(91.99) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device outage) via a crafted ARP packet, related to incorrect MTU validation, aka Bug IDs CSCuv71933, CSCuv61341, CSCuv61321, CSCuu78074, CSCut37060, CSCuv61266, CSCuv61351, CSCuv61358, and CSCuv61366.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-4323"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-08-19T23:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in Cisco NX-OS on Nexus 1000V devices for VMware vSphere 7.3(0)ZN(0.9); Nexus 3000 devices 6.0(2)U5(1.41), 7.0(3)I2(0.373), and 7.3(0)ZN(0.83); Nexus 4000 devices 4.1(2)E1(1b); Nexus 7000 devices 6.2(14)S1; Nexus 9000 devices 7.3(0)ZN(0.9); and MDS 9000 devices 6.2 (13) and 7.1(0)ZN(91.99) and MDS SAN-OS 7.1(0)ZN(91.99) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device outage) via a crafted ARP packet, related to incorrect MTU validation, aka Bug IDs CSCuv71933, CSCuv61341, CSCuv61321, CSCuu78074, CSCut37060, CSCuv61266, CSCuv61351, CSCuv61358, and CSCuv61366.",
"id": "GHSA-f846-7hhm-3qxh",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:52:44Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:52:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4323"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40469"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76367"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033321"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…