GHSA-CX7R-634M-2Q2H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-09-02 18:20 – Updated: 2021-06-01 22:21
VLAI?
Summary
Cross-Site Scripting in harp
Details
Withdrawn
This advisory has been withdrawn per request from the maintainer. Given harp is a static webserver, a XSS type of vulnerability is not appropriate.
Original advisory description
All versions of harp are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting. Due to misconfiguration of its rendering engine, harp does not sanitize the HTML output allowing attackers to run arbitrary JavaScript when processing malicious files.
Recommendation
No fix is currently available. Consider using an alternative module until a fix is made available.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "harp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-08-31T18:36:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Withdrawn\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn per request from the maintainer. Given harp is a static webserver, a XSS type of vulnerability is not appropriate.\n\n### Original advisory description\n\nAll versions of `harp` are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting. Due to misconfiguration of its rendering engine, `harp` does not sanitize the HTML output allowing attackers to run arbitrary JavaScript when processing malicious files.\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nNo fix is currently available. Consider using an alternative module until a fix is made available.",
"id": "GHSA-cx7r-634m-2q2h",
"modified": "2021-06-01T22:21:08Z",
"published": "2020-09-02T18:20:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/453795"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/806"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Cross-Site Scripting in harp",
"withdrawn": "2021-06-01T22:21:08Z"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…